FTC Dealer Advertising Rules: What US Dealers Need to Know

This article is general information only, not legal advice. For advertising compliance questions specific to your dealership, consult a qualified attorney.

In March 2026, the Federal Trade Commission sent warning letters to 97 auto dealership groups across the United States. The message was blunt: the price you advertise must be the total price — including all mandatory fees — that the customer will actually pay.

If you sell cars in the US, or you are a UK dealer watching how American regulators treat dealer advertising, this article covers where FTC enforcement actually stands in 2026: the legal standard, what happened to the CARS Rule, the real enforcement cases, and what all of it means for listing photos — including AI-generated imagery. It is part of a wider series on what is and is not allowed in dealer photography — AI car photos for dealers: what's allowed and what works is the umbrella guide.

The standard: Section 5 of the FTC Act

The foundation of US dealer advertising law is Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act, which empowers the FTC to prevent "unfair or deceptive acts or practices in or affecting commerce."

What counts as deceptive is set out in the FTC's Policy Statement on Deception (October 1983), which is still the operating test. The Commission will find deception where there is:

1. A representation, omission, or practice that is likely to mislead the consumer — and a photo is a representation, just as much as a price or a written claim.
2. Judged from the perspective of a consumer acting reasonably in the circumstances.
3. That is material — meaning it is likely to affect the consumer's decision to buy.

Note what is not in the test: intent. You do not have to mean to deceive anyone. If the overall impression your advert creates is likely to mislead a reasonable buyer about something that matters to the purchase, that is enough.

The CARS Rule: announced, vacated, withdrawn

In December 2023, the FTC announced the Combating Auto Retail Scams (CARS) Rule — a dealer-specific rule banning bait-and-switch tactics and hidden junk fees, with civil penalties attached.

It never took effect. Here is the timeline as it actually played out:

• 27 January 2025 — the US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit vacated the rule, granting a challenge brought by the National Automobile Dealers Association and the Texas Automobile Dealers Association. The court found the FTC had skipped a procedural step its own regulations required when making the rule. (NADA press release, January 2025)
• February 2026 — the FTC formally withdrew the CARS Rule in the Federal Register to conform with the court's decision. (Federal Register, 12 February 2026)

So as of June 2026, the CARS Rule is not in effect and has been withdrawn. But — and this is the part some dealers got wrong — the rule was vacated on procedural grounds, not because the conduct it targeted became legal. Everything the CARS Rule was written to catch is still reachable under Section 5. The enforcement record since proves it.

What enforcement actually looks like

The 97 warning letters (March 2026). The FTC's letters warned dealer groups nationwide that advertised prices must be the total price including all mandatory fees, and listed the practices it considers illegal: advertising a price that does not reflect all required fees, advertising a price built on rebates not available to all consumers, conditioning the advertised price on dealer financing, requiring add-on purchases not reflected in the price, and advertising unavailable or non-existent vehicles. "The FTC will remain focused on monitoring auto dealerships," the Bureau of Consumer Protection director said in the announcement. (FTC press release, March 2026)

Passport Automotive Group (2022). A Washington DC-area dealer group paid $3.38 million to settle FTC allegations that it advertised vehicles as "certified" or "reconditioned" at specific prices, then added hundreds or thousands of dollars in fees at the point of sale. (FTC press release, October 2022)

Lindsay Automotive Group (2026). The FTC and the Maryland Attorney General settled allegations that the group advertised deceptively low prices and then charged most buyers substantially more. Consumers charged more than $75 million between 2020 and 2025 may be eligible for redress, and the group pays a $3.1 million civil penalty to Maryland. (FTC press release, April 2026)

The Lindsay case also shows the second front: state attorneys general. The Maryland AG was a co-plaintiff with its own penalty. State-level consumer protection offices increasingly run dealer advertising cases alongside — or independently of — the FTC. The practical takeaway: the CARS Rule dying did not reduce the number of regulators watching dealer adverts. It may have increased it.

What this means for photos and AI imagery

Every case above is about price. But the deception standard is not a pricing rule — it covers any representation in an advert, and listing photos are representations.

Run the Section 5 test against a vehicle photo. Is it likely to mislead a reasonable buyer about something material? A photo that conceals visible damage, shows a different trim or colour, or presents features the car does not have fails that test the same way a hidden fee does. The misrepresentation standard does not care whether the misleading image came from a camera, an editing suite, or an AI model.

That is the honest frame for AI-edited imagery. The car in the output is not a representation of your vehicle — it is your photograph of that vehicle, composited into a new setting, with nothing about the car generated or altered. Check each output against the original before publishing all the same: a difficult shot can cut imperfectly, and under Section 5 the advert is the dealer's to answer for. If the photo a buyer sees matches the car they will find, changing the background does not misrepresent anything. We cover the full reasoning in are AI-edited car photos misleading? — and if you want the disclosure question specifically, should dealers disclose AI-edited photos? takes it head on.

If you are weighing up an AI photo tool and want straight answers about how the output works, the Motuva FAQ covers it without the gloss.

The short version

The CARS Rule is gone — vacated in January 2025, withdrawn in February 2026. The deception standard that matters never went anywhere. Section 5 reaches every claim in a dealer advert, photos included, and the 2026 warning letters and the Lindsay settlement show the FTC and state AGs are actively using it. Advertise the real price. Show the real car. Check AI output against your original before it goes live.

This article is general information only, not legal advice. US dealers should refer to the FTC's automobile industry guidance at ftc.gov and the FTC Policy Statement on Deception. For advice specific to your dealership, consult your own attorneys.

Start free — no card, no demo →